Showing posts with label social sciences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social sciences. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Charles Tilly Remembered

The Columbia University community mourns the loss of one of its beloved members, Charles Tilly, the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science, who passed away on April 29 after a long battle with cancer. He was 78.


Tilly, who had a joint appointment with the University's Departments of Sociology and Political Science, is widely considered the leading scholar of his generation on contentious politics and its relationship with military, economic, urban and demographic social change.


President of the Social Sciences Research Council Craig Calhoun called Tilly "one of the most distinguished of all contemporary social scientists," adding: "He is the most influential analyst of social movements and contentious politics, a path-breaker in the historical sociology of the state, a pivotal theorist of social inequality."


"His intellectual range and level of productivity are virtually unrivaled in the social sciences," said Columbia sociology Professor and Chair Thomas DiPrete. Adam Ashforth, professor of anthropology and political science at Northwestern University, described Tilly as "the founding father of twenty-first century sociology."


During the course of his 50-year career, Tilly's academic expertise covered urbanization, industrialization, collective action and state-making, and his most recent work explored social relations, identity and culture. His primary interest concerned Europe from 1500 to the present, but his work extended to North America and other parts of the world as well.


Tilly is well known for his generosity to students. Many recall thanking Tilly for his mentorship, only to receive the response: "Don't thank me, just do the same for your students."


One important training ground he offered to students was a succession of informal seminars, co-launched with his former wife Louise in their living room 40 years ago when he was a younger professor at the University of Michigan. Once titled the "Think, Then Drink" workshop, the name changed to the "Workshop on Contentious Politics" and was held regularly at Columbia for more than a decade. Many students continued to participate well past graduation and into their own professorship tenures.


"Much as his own scholarship transcended traditional disciplinary boundaries, these vibrant discussions brought a diverse array of professors and students together in an ongoing conversation that represented the best of historical social science," said former student and close friend Wayne Te Brake, now a professor of history at Purchase College. Participants enjoyed Tilly's "egalitarian rules for presentation, critique and intervention," he added.


Tilly was born May 27, 1929, in Lombard, Ill., and studied at Harvard University, earning the bachelor's degree magna cum laude in 1950 and the Ph.D. in sociology in 1958. He also studied at Balliol College, Oxford, and the Catholic University of Angers, France, and served in the U.S. Navy during the Korean War. Before arriving at Columbia in 1996, Tilly taught at the University of Delaware, Harvard, the University of Toronto, the University of Michigan and The New School for Social Research. In addition, he held several short-term research and teaching appointments at universities throughout Europe and North America during the course of his career.


Tilly was a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, the Sociological Research Association and the Ordre des Palmes Academiques.


In addition to his theoretical and substantive interests, Tilly wrote extensively on the subject of research methodology. His writings touched on epistemology, the nature of causality, process analysis, the use of narrative as a method for historical explanation, mechanism-based explanations, contextual analysis, political ethnography, and quantitative methods in historical analysis, among many topics.


During his lifetime Tilly received several prominent awards, including: the Common Wealth Award in sociology (1982); the Amalfi Prize for Sociology and Social Sciences (1994); the Eastern Sociological Society's Merit Award for Distinguished Scholarship (1996); the American Sociological Association's Career of Distinguished Scholarship Award (2005); the International Political Science Association's Karl Deutsch Award in Comparative Politics (2006); the Phi Beta Kappa Sidney Hook Memorial Award (2006); and the Social Science Research Council's Albert O. Hirschman Award (2008).


In addition, he was awarded honorary doctorates in social sciences from Erasmus University, Rotterdam (1983); the Institut d'Etudes Politiques, University of Paris (1993); the University of Toronto (1995); the University of Strasbourg (1996); the University of Geneva (1999); the University of Crete (2002); the University of Quebec at Montreal (2004); and the University of Michigan (2007).


In 2001, Columbia's sociology graduate students named Tilly the Professor of the Year.


He authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited 51 published books and monographs and over 600 scholarly articles. His major works include "The Vendee: A Sociological Analysis of the Counter-Revolution of 1793" (1964); "As Sociology Meets History" (1981); "Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons" (1984); "The Contentious French" (1983); "European Revolutions 1492-1992" (1993); "Cities and the Rise of States in Europe: A.D. 1000 to 1800" (1994); "Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834" (1995); "Durable Inequality" (1998); "Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies" (1998); "Dynamics of Contention" (2001); "Social Movements 1768-2004" (2004); "Trust and Rule" (2005); "Why?" (2006); and "Democracy" (2007).


"Professor Tilly will be remembered as an extraordinarily generous and innovative scholar and teacher by a vast network of colleagues, students and friends around the country and across the globe," said Te Brake.


Tilly is survived by his former wife (and sometimes collaborator), Louise; his brothers, Richard and Stephen, and sister Carolyn; his children, Chris, Kit, Laura and Sarah; their spouses Marie, Steve, Derek, and David; his grandchildren, Amanda, Charlotte, Chris, Abby, Ben, Jon and Becky; and his great-grandchildren, Jamie and Julian.


President Bollinger's Statement on the Passing of Professor Charles Tilly


Columbia lost one of its finest citizens when Professor Charles Tilly passed away April 29. Most recently the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science, serving the departments of Political Science and Sociology, he was a scholar of boundless energy and intellect. Few could, or will ever, match his scholarly output and lasting impact. His 50 years of teaching, writing and intellectual inspiration will be missed here at Columbia and everywhere people seek to understand how history and societies move forward.


The extraordinary half-century career of Charles Tilly continuously demonstrated scholarship that transcended disciplinary boundaries. It seemed that he could write, interpret, and explain virtually anything to curious minds. With more than 600 articles and 51 books and monographs bearing his name, Charles Tilly literally wrote the book on the contentious dynamics and the ethnographic foundations of political history.


Though he received an extraordinary number of special awards, scholarly inductions and honorary degrees during his long and productive career, we will remember that, since 1996, he was a distinguished member of the Columbia community. His students, fellow faculty members and friends will all remember someone not only who reached and remained at the pinnacle of his field but also a warm and valued colleague who never stopped asking profound questions.


Lee C. Bollinger
President
.
ISERP, Columbia Univ.
.

'Paradigms' in the Social Sciences
Interview with Charles Tilly

.
.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

“Paradigm Shift” Needed in Social Science Doctoral Education

Social Science PhDs – Five+ Years Out is a survey of 3,025 individuals who received their Ph.D.s between 1995 and 1999 in six fields, including political science, to assess the quality of doctoral education in U.S. social science programs.

The survey was conducted by the Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education (CIRGE) at the University of Washington. Similar to a report released in January by the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate (see related story “Five-Year Study Calls for Change”), the CIRGE study found current doctoral education programs lacking in preparing their students for the 21st-century job market. According to the report:Social science doctoral students need better career preparation and better support for learning to manage careers.

In particular, universities need to recognize that most men and women are in relationships, many with children, and this situation influences PhD careers; universities need to pay more attention to connecting research training with teaching, writing and publishing; and universities need to bring professional development competencies such as teamwork, working in interdisciplinary contexts, grant writing, and managing people and budgets, from the margins to the center of PhD education.

Respondents represented six fields of study -- anthropology, communications, geography, history, political science, and sociology. Of the 701 political scientists who responded, 37.8% were female, and the age in median years at the time the doctorate was awarded was 31.8 years. A majority (91.9%) of political scientists surveyed were employed full time, 30.6% were tenured faculty, 32% were in tenured-track positions, 25% were employed in the business/government/non-profit sector, and 12.4% were in other academic positions.

The job characteristic that the greatest percent (68.8%) of political scientists said they were “very satisfied” with was the autonomy of work, and the characteristic that the smallest percent (25.2%) said they were “very satisfied” with was salary.

When it comes to support from the dissertation chair or advisor, about one-half of all political science Ph.D.s said they were “very satisfied” with the quality of advice in developing their research topic (50.1%), the quality of guidance to complete the Ph.D. (51.4%), and support in making career decisions (52.6%). Fewer said they were “very satisfied” with the overall quality of mentoring (45.3%), support in their job search (40.2%), and help in publishing their research (25.3%).

The table below shows the percent of political science Ph.D.s who said a skill was “very important” and the percent who said the quality of training for that skill was “excellent.” (n=701)

Skill
Percent Who Said It Is "Very Important" Percent Who Said the Quality of Training Was "Excellent"
Thinking critically
93
79
Analyzing/synthesizing data
73
60
Writing/publishing
72
28
Designing research
51
40
Working with people from diverse social/educational backgrounds
44
22
Working in interdisciplinary context
49
29
Working collaboratively
44
15
Developing presentation skills
83
32
Writing proposals for funding
37
10
Managing people/budgets
31
4

To read a summary of the report, click here.


Five-Year Study of Doctoral Education Calls for Changes

The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century (January 2008, Jossey Bass, 256 pages, $40) is the culmination of a five-year study by the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate (CID) of 84 doctoral-granting departments in six fields to assess how well they are preparing their graduates to be scholars in the 21st century.

The authors, George Walker, Chris Golde, Laura Jones, Andrea Conklin Bueschel, and Pat Hutchings, find doctoral education programs generally lacking. More teaching opportunities for graduate students are needed as well as “better, more systematic feedback and reflection that can turn pedagogical experience into pedagogical expertise.” Preparation for research has been taken for granted and ignored in reports and recommendations for doctoral education, they note. Additionally, graduate students “may be treated as cheap labor in the service of an adviser’s current project and personal advancement,” and funded research does not encourage the types of behaviors, such as creativity, collaboration, and risk taking, that are valued in today’s work world.

The participating departments in the CID study made a commitment to examine their purposes and effectiveness, implement changes in response to their findings, and monitor the effects of the changes. The authors report that, in some cases, departmental deliberations revealed “inconsistent and unclear expectations, uneven student access to important opportunities, poor communication between members of the program, and a general inattention to patterns of student progress and outcomes.”

The authors suggest four focal areas to guide change in doctoral education programs:

(1) Protocols for faculty and graduate students to question whether traditions, such as qualifying examinations and doctoral dissertations, serve their intended purposes;

(2) Attention to the “complex process of formation,” a phrase the authors use to describe the development of professional identity, guided by principles that delineate faculty and student responsibilities and emphasize collaboration and mutual respect;

(3) Adoption of an apprenticeship model that is reciprocal and fosters learning for both the professor and student, “with greater collective responsibility for the student experience”; and

(4) Cultures that are “lively” intellectual communities that celebrate “the advancement of learning and knowledge.”

To read more about the CID or to learn more about some of the participating departments and their work in the study, visit http://gallery.carnegiefoundation.org/cid/


http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/Publications/MPSANews2-1/CIRGE.html

http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/Publications/MPSANews2-1/CID.html

© 2008 Midwest Political Science Association
.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Professional Grant Proposal Writing Workshop

The Grant Institute's Grants 101: Professional Grant Proposal Writing Workshop will be held in Providence, Rhode Island, April 16 - 18, 2008. Interested development professionals, researchers, faculty, and graduate students should register as soon as possible, as demand means that seats will fill up quickly. Please forward, post, and distribute this e-mail to your colleagues and listservs.

All participants will receive certification in professional grant writing from the Institute. For more information call (888) 824 - 4424 or visit The Grant Institute at
www.thegrantinstitute.com.

Please find the program description below:

The Grant Institute
Grants 101: Professional Grant Proposal Writing Workshop
will be held in
Providence, Rhode Island
April 16 - 18, 2008
8:00 AM - 5:00 PM

The Grant Institute's Grants 101 course is an intensive and detailed introduction to the process, structure, and skill of professional proposal writing. This course is characterized by its ability to act as a thorough overview, introduction, and refresher at the same time. In this course, participants will learn the entire proposal writing process and complete the course with a solid understanding of not only the ideal proposal structure, but a holistic understanding of the essential factors, which determine whether or not a program gets funded. Through the completion of interactive exercises and activities, participants will complement expert lectures by putting proven techniques into practice. This course is designed for both the beginner looking for a thorough introduction and the intermediate looking for a refresher course that will strengthen their grant acquisition skills. This class, simply put, is designed to get results by creating professional grant proposal writers.


Participants will become competent program planning and proposal writing professionals after successful completion of the Grants 101 course. In three active and informative days, students will be exposed to the art of successful grant writing practices, and led on a journey that ends with a masterful grant proposal.

Grants 101 consists of three (3) courses that will be completed during the three-day workshop.

(1) Fundamentals of Program Planning

This course is centered on the belief that "it's all about the program." This intensive course will teach professional program development essentials and program evaluation. While most grant writing "workshops" treat program development and evaluation as separate from the writing of a proposal, this class will teach students the relationship between overall program planning and grant writing.

(2) Professional Grant Writing


Designed for both the novice and experienced grant writer, this course will make each student an overall proposal writing specialist. In addition to teaching the basic components of a grant proposal, successful approaches, and the do's and don'ts of grant writing, this course is infused with expert principles that will lead to a mastery of the process. Strategy resides at the forefront of this course's intent to illustrate grant writing as an integrated, multidimensional, and dynamic endeavor. Each student will learn to stop writing the grant and to start writing the story. Ultimately, this class will illustrate how each component of the grant proposal represents an opportunity to use proven techniques for generating support.


(3) Grant Research

At its foundation, this course will address the basics of foundation, corporation, and government grant research. However, this course will teach a strategic funding research approach that encourages students to see research not as something they do before they write a proposal, but as an integrated part of the grant seeking process. Students will be exposed to online and database research tools, as well as publications and directories that contain information about foundation, corporation, and government grant opportunities. Focusing on funding sources and basic social science research, this course teaches students how to use research as part of a strategic grant acquisition effort.

Registration
$597.00 tuition includes all materials and certificates.

Each student will receive:
*The Grant Institute Certificate in Professional Grant Writing
*The Grant Institute's Guide to Successful Grant Writing
*The Grant Institute Grant Writer's Workbook with sample proposals, forms, and outlines


Registration Methods

1) On-Line - Complete the online registration form at
www.thegrantinstitute.com under Register Now. We'll send your confirmation by e-mail.

2) By Phone - Call (888) 824-4424 to register by phone. Our friendly Program Coordinators will be happy to assist you and answer your questions.

3) By E-mail - Send an e-mail with your name, organization, and basic contact information to
info@thegrantinstitute.com and we will reserve your slot and send your Confirmation Packet.

You have received this invitation due to specific educational affiliation. We respect your privacy and want to ensure that interested parties are made aware of The Grant Institute programs and schedules. This is intended to be a one-time announcement. In any event, you should not receive any more announcements unless there is a program next year in your area. To be unlisted from next year's announcement, send a blank e-mail to

unlist@thegrantinstitute.com
and write "Unlist" in the subject line.
.

Friday, January 25, 2008

'Paradigms' in the Social Sciences

Interview with Charles Tilly

Bio: "Charles Tilly was born on May 20, 1929, in Lombard, Illinois (near Chicago). He was educated at Harvard and Oxford, obtaining the Ph.D. in sociology at Harvard in 1958. He has taught at University of Delaware, Harvard University, the University of Toronto, University of Michigan, the New School University, and Columbia University, where he now is the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science..."

For more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Tilly


Paradigms in the Social Sciences



Historical Sociology


Causal Mechanisms


Big Questions


State Formation

Friday, January 11, 2008

Podcasts, Video Interviews, and Lectures

Princeton University Press

Go to Listing by Title

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Some Sociologists and Their Ideas

The University of Amsterdam
.
Addams, J. * Adorno, Th. W. * Aron, R. * Baudrillard, J. * Becker, H. * Bell, D. * Benedict, R.F. * Berger, P. L. * Bhaskar, R. * Blau, P. * Blumer, H. * Boltanski, L. * Boudon, R. * Bourdieu, P. * Coleman, J.A. * Collins, R. * Comte, A. * Cooley, Ch. H. * Coser, L. * Crompton, R. * Crozier, M. * Dahrendorf, R. * Du Bois, W.E.B * Durkheim, E. * Elias, N. * Elster, J. * Etzioni, A. * Ferguson, A. * Foucault, M. * Fromm, E. * Garfinkel, H. * Geertz, C. * Geiger, Th. * Giddens, A. * Goffman, E. * Goudsblom, J. * Gouldner, A.W. * Gramsci, A. * Habermas, J. * Halbwachs, M. * Hall, S. * Haraway, D.J. * Homans, G.C. * Horkheimer, M. * Inglehart, R. * Kanter E. M. * Kearl, M. * König, R. * Latour, B. * Lefebvre, H. * Lenski, G. * Lévi-Strauss, C. * Luckmann, Th. * Luhmann, N. * Malinowski, B. * Mann, M. * Mannheim, K. * Marcuse, H. * Marx, K. * Mauss, M. * McLuhan, M * Mead, G. H. * Mead, M. * Merton, R. K. * Michels, R. * Millett, K. * Mills, C. W. * Moreno, J. L. * Morgan, L. H. * Offe, C. * Pareto, V. * Park, R.E. * Parsons, T. * Popper, K. * Rousseau, J.-J. * Schütz, A. * Simmel, G. * Sorokin, P.A. * Spencer, H. * Taylor, W.F. * Thomas, W.I. * Tocqueville, A. de * Toffler, A. * Tönnies, F. * Touraine, A. * Toynbee, A. * Veblen, T. * Walby, S. * Wallerstein, I. * Wald, L.F. * Weber, Max * Willis, Paul * Znaniecki, F.W.
.
.

Friday, December 09, 2005

The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences

Ian Shapiro, Yale University
Princeton University Press, 2005
.
Introduction [HTML]
.
In this captivating yet troubling book, Ian Shapiro offers a searing indictment of many influential practices in the social sciences and humanities today. Perhaps best known for his critique of rational choice theory, Shapiro expands his purview here. In discipline after discipline, he argues, scholars have fallen prey to inward-looking myopia that results from--and perpetuates--a flight from reality.

In the method-driven academic culture we inhabit, argues Shapiro, researchers too often make display and refinement of their techniques the principal scholarly activity. The result is that they lose sight of the objects of their study. Pet theories and methodological blinders lead unwelcome facts to be ignored, sometimes not even perceived. The targets of Shapiro's critique include the law and economics movement, overzealous formal and statistical modeling, various reductive theories of human behavior, misguided conceptual analysis in political theory, and the Cambridge school of intellectual history.

As an alternative to all of these, Shapiro makes a compelling case for problem-driven social research, rooted in a realist philosophy of science and an antireductionist view of social explanation. In the lucid--if biting--prose for which Shapiro is renowned, he explains why this requires greater critical attention to how problems are specified than is usually undertaken. He illustrates what is at stake for the study of power, democracy, law, and ideology, as well as in normative debates over rights, justice, freedom, virtue, and community. Shapiro answers many critics of his views along the way, securing his position as one of the distinctive social and political theorists of our time.

Ian Shapiro is Sterling Professor of Political Science at Yale University, where he also serves as Henry R. Luce Director of the Yale Center for International and Area Studies. Among his many books are The State of Democratic Theory and, with Michael J. Graetz, Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth (Princeton); and The Moral Foundations of Politics.

Endorsements:
"Ian Shapiro's work has inspired a generation of both scholars and practitioners of politics--for the simple reason that he meets the standards of the former and the needs of the latter. In this book, he helps rescue the study of politics and society from moralists, who believe individuals have more control over their fates than history or economics would support, and from those scientists who view human behavior as mechanistic. He is a theoretician with solid grounding in the real world, a master-observer of the human capacity that is at the heart of the best and worst in political and social life--and everything in between: choice. He writes with a clarity that is refreshing as well as redolent of the confidence he rightly feels in his own judgments."--Strobe Talbott, President of the Brookings Institution

"With his characteristic boldness and insight, Ian Shapiro surveys the reigning theories in the social sciences and finds them wanting. A superb collection of essays from a trenchant critic."--Joyce Appleby, Professor Emerita of History, University of California, Los Angeles, author of Liberalism and Republicanism in the Historical Imagination

"Informed by normative political theory and the philosophy of science, and grounded in a deep knowledge of empirical studies in political science, Ian Shapiro's essays raise fundamental questions for those in all the disciplines--including law--who seek to understand and explain social behavior in the construction of decent public institutions."--Mark Tushnet, Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law, Georgetown University

"It is always a pleasure to read Ian Shapiro's reflections on political theory, the methodology of political science, and on the state of the discipline. He is sceptical but not cynical, he is critical without malice, and he laces his insights with a dry wit that makes some sometimes quite tough argumentation unusually digestible. It is good to have these pieces so conveniently assembled in one place."--Alan Ryan, New College, Oxford

"This is an important book for two main reasons. First, its central argument is, undoubtedly, correct. Recent methodological advances in the social sciences, combined with pressures from increased professionalization, have rendered epidemic the 'pathologies' that are the book's subject. Second, Shapiro is one of only a handful of scholars who have drawn social scientists' attention to these problems. The tightly argued essays that comprise the book are written in a clear, jargon-free prose that will make them accessible to scholars across a range of fields and disciplines."--Clarissa Rile Hayward, Ohio State University, author of De-Facing Power

"This lucid, brilliant, and beautifully written volume of essays contributes substantially to our understanding of the philosophy and practice of research in the human sciences. Anyone undertaking such research, or interested in its results, will want to read it."--Elisabeth Ellis, Texas A&M University, author of Kant's Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World

Table of Contents:
Acknowledgments ix
INTRODUCTION: Fear of Not Flying 1
CHAPTER ONE: The Difference That Realism Makes: Social Science and the Politics of Consent by Ian Shapiro and Alexander Wendt 19
CHAPTER TWO: Revisiting the Pathologies of Rational Choice by Donald Green and Ian Shapiro 51CHAPTER THREE: Richard Posner's Praxis 100
CHAPTER FOUR: Gross Concepts in Political Argument 152
CHAPTER FIVE: Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics: Or, What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It 178
CHAPTER SIX: The Political Science Discipline: A Comment on David Laitin 204
Index 213
.
.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

Miscellaneous Links (I)

HUMANUM, the Research Institute for the Humanities

Thursday, September 29, 2005

Research Channel: One Bright Idea After Another

Research Channel is a consortium of research universities and corporate research divisions dedicated to broadening the access to and appreciation of our individual and collective activities, ideas, and opportunities in basic and applied research.

One of the major goals of Research Channel is to use program content creation and manipulation processes as testing medium for analog and digital broadcast and on-demand multimedia offerings, thus providing an unusual opportunity to experiment with new methods of distribution and interaction on a global basis.

For our many viewers on cable, direct broadcast satellite, and the Internet, Research Channel is the C-SPAN of scientific and medical research.

Learn more about Research Channel in the "About ResearchChannel.pdf" and this video clip (runtime 5:36):
.

Friday, July 15, 2005

Some UCTV Events

University of California Television

An Evening with Oliver Stone: A Dialogue on Classic Filmmaking
Lunch Poems: Suji Kwock Kim
New Dimensions in Classical Guitar: Mesut Ozgen and Friends in a Multimedia Performance
Identity and Violence: The Violence of Illusion, Amartya Sen
Conversations with History: On Theory, with Amartya Sen
Changes in the Process of Aging During the Twentieth Century: Common Analytical Errors, Robert Fogel
Conversations with History: The Pentagon's New Map, with Thomas P.M. Barnett
Robert McChesney: Media and Politics in the United States Today
What Political Reforms Are Possible in the Islamic Middle East?, Joseph Kickasola
.

Economist.com News Analysis and Views

News about Key Issues

Loading...

Advertiser Links

Düşünce Kahvesi

Asia Times Online

BBC News / Americas